The recent controversy surrounding the California Senate’s proposed changes to solar laws has come to a head with the removal of a controversial provision in AB 942. This provision would have allowed the state to break long-standing contracts with homeowners who have invested in residential solar systems.
For years, California has allowed for net metering, a system where homeowners can sell excess solar power back to the grid and receive credits to offset their electricity bills. Many homeowners entered into 20-year contracts with the expectation that they would be able to recoup their investment by selling power back to the grid.
However, private utilities have long been opposed to net metering, as it cuts into their profits from selling electricity. The most recent proposal in AB 942 would have allowed the state to break these contracts early, causing an uproar among homeowners and solar industry organizations.
After significant public backlash, the California Senate’s Energy Committee, chaired by Senator Josh Becker, decided to remove the language that would break rooftop solar contracts. This victory for solar homeowners shows the power of public advocacy in shaping legislation.
While the bill is not perfect, as it still includes restrictions on the California Climate Credit for some homeowners, it is a step in the right direction. The removal of the provision to break solar contracts demonstrates that with enough public effort, bad laws can be stopped or amended.
Overall, this development serves as a reminder of the importance of public engagement in the legislative process. By voicing their concerns and advocating for change, individuals can make a difference in shaping policies that affect them.
